disowned vs in background
David Vinayak Wallace
Gumby at MIT-MC.ARPA
Mon Mar 31 12:02:00 CEST 1986
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 86 17:23:33 EST
From: "Pandora B. Berman" <CENT at AI.AI.MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu 27 Mar 86 06:47:55-EST
From: "Mark Becker" <Cent.Mbeck%OZ.AI.MIT.EDU at XX.LCS.MIT.EDU>
I admit ignorance as well... when I see a "disowned" job on an ITS, its
usually associated with some username somewhere.
----------begin forwarded mail----------
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 86 23:17:29 EST
From: Richard Barth <BARTH at MC.LCS.MIT.EDU>
Ignorant question for today...
What's the difference between running a job in the background and
beyond my limited technical ability to describe. someone on this list should
be able to help you more.
Roughly speaking, a disowned job has no superior nor controlling TTY,
(f'rinstance like COMSAT normally runs). DDT lets you run jobs in
background, (e.g. w/ or ) by running them without the TTY and
handling output differently. Their superior is still DDT. From ITS's
point of view the only difference between running a job in foreground or
in background is who owns the TTY.
For a more detailed description, do :UUO .DISOWN, .ATTY, etc.
PS: bug-its people: what do you think of using BUG-ITS for questions
like this? I think it's a good idea, but if it's going to cause the
fixers of bugs to remove themselves on the grounds of traffic
levels, then we should have yet another list.
More information about the ITS